Collaborative partner for every delivery method
However you define success, we’ll deliver it
Your goals are our goals. We work diligently to crush our clients’ project goals. There are many ways to get there — from traditional hard-bid projects to alternative methods like design-build and construction management at-risk.
Each delivery method has its benefits. We leverage our understanding of each method and serve as our clients’ advocates. Regardless of the delivery method selected, we are passionate about maximizing the value of each project.
Delivery Method Breakdown
We find value by knowing where to look
At ESS, we leverage our understanding of traditional and alternative delivery methods to form collaborative project teams and engineer value wherever possible.
There’s a reason Design-Bid-Build delivery is the industry standard — this linear process creates clear roles and responsibilities among the project owner, designer, and general contractor, and drives competitive pricing for pre-approved designs.
- Straight-forward process
- Clear project phasing
- Cost-driven for public savings
- Limited innovation potential
- No constructability input from General Contractor
- Sometimes a slower process
The Design-Build model has burst onto the civil construction scene for good reason: streamlined communication between the client, contractor and subs can lead to faster completion and cost savings that make projects hugely successful.
- Contractor takes on more risk
- Collaborative project team
- Value Engineering potential
- Less competitive bidding
- Can sometimes shift project timelines
- Requires high level of trust
As its name suggests, Progressive Design-Build projects go beyond the levels of collaboration and innovation found in other delivery methods. The Design-Build team has the flexibility to push the limits of design innovation and creativity for remarkable results.
- Huge process flexibility
- Ultimate collaboration
- Can speed project delivery
- Undefined milestone deadlines
- Higher learning curve for project partners
- Robust design iterations
The CM/GC project delivery method offers a unique contract dynamic, allowing for greater client control, collaboration, and innovation. It’s a favored method among clients due to enhanced risk management and time and cost savings.
- Qualification-based selection
- High potential for innovation
- Maximum schedule acceleration
- Not legal in all markets for all projects
- Lack of subcontractor transparency at times
Delivery Method comparison
How delivery methods stack up
If you’re in the business of building infrastructure, you know choosing a delivery method for a project is a big decision. When done right, it’s a game changer. Select and compare important aspects of delivery methods below to see how each stacks up.
Partner Testimonials
Prime contractor Emery Sapp and Sons, along with design partner Bartlett & West, exuded the partnering philosophy during their ATC pursuit. This accelerated construction project would not have been as successful without the partnering efforts of ESS and the other involved parties.
SW District Engineer, MoDOT
Being a national leader in alternative delivery projects and in the Midwest, ESS is our go-to contractor for their commitment to project innovation, ability to weave safety into their concepts, and the speed at which they tackle a job.
Principal Bridge Engineer, Parsons
ESS News
Special Delivery: The Latest ESS News
From our award-winning construction projects to our kick@$$ team of employee-owners, news is always breaking at ESS. Get the scoop on what we’ve been up to lately.
Delivery Performance You Can Count On
Featured Projects
Projects We’ve Delivered
From large-scale design-build projects to landmark site developments, we’ve done it all. In every case, we’ve collaborated with project owners to add value and deliver results that last.